Suspensions in the NHL: Curbing the Concussion Epidemic

(Aftermath of the hit that may end Marc Savard’s career)

What is the purpose of handing out suspensions? Some believe that introducing punishment ensures fairness – if a player has been injured, it’s only right that the offending party sit out for some period of time as well. (Some even go so far as to say that a player should be suspended for the entire duration of the other party’s  injury). However, I believe that the main reason to suspend a player is for the sake of prevention. When determining suspensions, what factors should newly hired head disciplinarian Brendan Shanahan take into consideration? Here are some criteria to consider:

  • Intention/negligence of offending player
  • Inherent danger of hit
  • Level of defencelessness of victim
  • Severity of injury
  • History of offender

(In many cases it’s difficult to separate these factors. For instance, negligence and victim defencelessness have an obvious connection; likewise, dangerous hits and severity of injury are highly correlated.)

There’s a lot of talk about the Rome hit, and rightly so. It was dangerous, was delivered to an unsuspecting victim (no player should reasonably expect to be hit after nearly a full second without the puck), and it caused a serious injury. While I don’t believe that Rome had any intent to injure Horton, he is guilty of negligence. Many people were surprised by the length of the suspension, but I think it’s a small yet important step in the effort to remove the type of predatory hits that have plagued the game for years. Let’s take a look at a few others:

Concussion Spotlight |—–Concussions—–|
Hitter Hittee Date Suspension Hit Type Length Injury Prior Subsequent
Aaron Rome Nathan Horton Jun 6, 2011 *4 games Late TBD No
Dave Steckel Sidney Crosby Jan 1, 2011 None bs * Hit – Present No *Yes
Matt Cooke Marc Savard Mar 7, 2010 None Bs+elbow 7 weeks Yes Yes
Mike Richards David Booth Oct 24, 2009 None bs 3 months No Yes
Corey Perry Claude Giroux Jan 3, 2009 4 games Late+bs+elbow 2 weeks No No
Randy Jones Patrice Bergeron Oct 27, 2007 2 games From behind 6 months No Yes
*playoffs bs=blindside *sustained a second concussion 4 days later
Hit Video link
Rome on Horton http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUYqTE3cnuQ
Steckel on Crosby http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8cQxJvgeJA
Cooke on Savard http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z1vJrIAg-0
Richards on Booth http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIXcGOr4-04
Perry on Giroux http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kelfxdCEjZs
Jones on Bergeron http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xAEetam6HQ&feature=related

To be frank, the NHL’s handling of events like these has been nothing short of pathetic. While the Crosby hit was the most innocent (most people would agree it wasn’t suspendable), the four others were dangerous, high impact plays. Most of the offending players were guilty of negligence – except Cooke and Perry, who clearly had intent. And all the incidents, including Crosby’s, contained a defenceless victim. Between the 5 hits listed (Rome aside) there have been exactly six (6) games worth of suspensions handed out, while the injured players collectively missed nearly 1.5 years. It’s hard to know if longer suspensions would decrease the incidence of these types of plays, but it’s disappointing that the NHL has had such a laissez-faire approach until quite recently.

Certainly suspensions aren’t the only means by which the NHL can try to combat head injuries. Another problem is the use of hard plastic shoulder/elbow pads, which bludgeon the chins of opposing players, causing brain trauma. In years gone by, players wore soft padding, and the effect of hits was somewhat muted because players’ bones were essentially covered by a hard pillow. (It would be very interesting to chart concussion data before and after the introduction of the hard-cap padding). The increased size, strength, and speed of today’s players is another contributing factor, but obviously one that cannot be helped.

At some point, the NHL must take the safety of its players more seriously. Unfortunately in the hockey world, traditionalists begin every head injury debate with the slippery slope argument “if we make hit x illegal, we’ll eventually take hitting out of the game”, contributing to the prevailing inertia. Many intelligent onlookers have said that it may take the loss of a major star to turn the tide; here’s hoping that Crosby won’t be the necessary casualty.

 

3 thoughts on “Suspensions in the NHL: Curbing the Concussion Epidemic

  1. The NHL should start the 2011-2012 season with harsher punishments. Issue a statement that these kind of hits are unacceptable and from this point forward a larger suspension will occur. Not playing in 1-4 games in an 82 game season is nothing. In the NFL, if a player gets suspended and misses just 1 game that is more of an effect that missing 5 games in the NHL.

  2. good article but you can’t use the richards and cooke hits because by the letter of the law at the time of the infraction, those hits were completely legal. Only after this hits did the league sit down and formulate the blindside rule. Seeing as the Rome suspension was given down by Mike Murphy, the same Mike Murhpy who “saw no clear evidence” of Burrow’s bite, I believe this suspension was as simple as who is the surris, MB native Aaron Rome in the grater scheme of things. Who is Nathan Horton? had Horton not been so injured in such a vulgar manner no way Rome gets 4 Cup Final Games. If thats Bieksa hitting Peverly and he goes to the bench and then leaves with an “UBI”, one game at most. This is clearly a Disposable player who is used by the nhl to send the mainstream media that “hey we are strong on concussions” message during a highly viewed game. The NHL Wheel of Justice is a joke, hopefully Shanny can fix that by giving everyone their fiar due in a consistant manner despite of the name on the back(on both the hitter and the hittee).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *